Math Books I Study(& love) These Days
As an undergrad student of physics, I have been studying mathematics rigorously from the first days of my freshman year. Here is a list of books that I have been studying lately to develop my mathematical background:
Vector Calculus by Susan Jane Colley
Vector Calculus by Susan Jane Colley
Vector
calculus is a mathematical tool that a physicist uses on a daily
basis. The branches of physics where vector calculus is used are a
lot in number; classical mechanics, classical electromagnetism, fluid
mechanics, classical field theory- to name a few. And it’s an
prerequisite to learn differential geometry.
I
have been studying vector calculus for some time. And Susan Jane
Colley’s has been quite a nice guide to learning vector calculus.
What I love about the book is that it’s emphasis on rigorous
development of the subject while still not very dry to study. And it
contains lots of nice problems to test one mathematical
understanding; especially the miscellaneous problems at the end of
the chapter amalgamates concepts of all the sections inside it.
I am
also studying Murray R. Speigel’s Vector Analysis together with
Hobson’s and Arfken’s Mathematical physics books as supplementary
books on this topic.
As I
mentioned in the previous blog post, learning analysis with rigor is
a necessity for a wanna be theoretical physicist. And what other book
could I study except this classic text on analysis. This book has a
traditional statement-proof based approach. While it may seem like
too congested, this book is spot on rigor. The problems at the end of
the each chapter will test one’s ability to proof statements.
Though
I have only studied 3 chapters of the book, I wish to study all the
chapters in the near future.
Though
the time span of my journey in physics is very short, one tool I have
used countless times to this day is the craft of solving differential
equations. Whatever area of physics you may be studying you will
obviously find yourself solving ODEs or PDEs. Though I haven't still
encountered the problems where solving PDEs is a must, my journey
with classical mechanics, classical electrodynamics, fluid dynamics
has demanded a good proficiency over ODEs.
Zill's
book is particularly entertaining in its friendly approach. A lot of
people in my country study Ross's book for learning ODEs, but this
book seems to me particulary dry. Besides, the problems at the end of
the each chapter in Zill's book, has been classified into few
categories to address different needs of the reader. But, the most
important thing that puts this book ahead of Ross's one is its
emphasis on modeling physical phenomena and numerical ODE solving.
A
nice book, indeed.
A First Course in Probability by Sheldon Ross
I have just started studying this book, so can't tell much about it. But, nonetheless this book seems to me a good one after studying a few pages. It has lots off nice problems too.
I have just started studying this book, so can't tell much about it. But, nonetheless this book seems to me a good one after studying a few pages. It has lots off nice problems too.
Let's
be honest; all the students of physical sciences need to learn
statistical methods. But I prefer to learn everything rigorously. For
this reason, I was a little disappointed when the freshman Statistics
course at my university followed a surveyor's style, rather than focusing on
the mathematical basis of statistics. So, I wanted a book with
emphasis on mathematical rigor than blindly applying statistical
methods.
Scheffer et al's book is really suitable on this regard. Lots of proofs, lots of challenging problems to test one's skill. Yeah, this book is a bliss.
Scheffer et al's book is really suitable on this regard. Lots of proofs, lots of challenging problems to test one's skill. Yeah, this book is a bliss.
I
started this book some 7/8 months earlier. As an introductory book
this book is particulary well written. The text is not that heavy,
but explains the concepts really well.
With
this book, I am also studying Tristan Needham's Visual Complex Analysis to develop intuition in this field of mathematics. Actually,
Needham's book is a real gem, a book with real uncommon approach, but
spot on realizing its goal to give satisfying picture of the complex
number field.
I
was searching for a mathematically oriented text on integral
transforms, as I didn't like the 'physicist' approach towards the
subject. So, did a little research on internet, and Voila! found this
grand creation. This book covers Fourier, Laplace and Legendre (and
few others) transforms rigorously with many examples of application
in physics.
This
book is particularly encyclopedic, may not be suitable as an
introductory text if you read it thoroughly page after page. This
book needs a more discontinuous approach for studying it which you
will understand if you go through the contents of the book.
So, what do you think about this books? Let me know.
So, what do you think about this books? Let me know.
Comments
Post a Comment